Re: Suggestion: add -dmo suffix to package names

Dominique Dumont <dod@???> writes:

> Le Sunday 22 April 2012 08:02:42, Christian Marillat a écrit :
>> Normaly I tested all package who depends on libxine2 but I missed
>> libxine2-xvdr because the package name start with libxine2.
>
> ok.
>
>> It is easy to see which packages come from my repository. Packages with
>> -0.3 and -0.4
>
> I was not aware of this convention. In fact, I've never noticed the subtle
> difference in the debian_revision number. :-/
>
> May be this would be the right place to clearly indicate the dmo origin with a
> debian_revision like -0.3.dmo or -0.4.dmo ?

-dmo1, -dmo2 is the best. dch is able to increse the number only if the
latest character is a number.

I'll do that for next uploads. Does not hesitate to remind me if I forgot.

Christian