Auteur: Ian Campbell Date: À: dmo-discussion Sujet: Re: About MythTV 35.0
On Sun, 2025-03-02 at 13:53 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sun, 2025-03-02 at 08:34 -0500, James Abernathy wrote:
> >
> > This may be a dumb question, but why require the unstable branch? In
> > testing the recent v35 branch of mythtv, I've been building the .deb
> > packages on Debian 12 bookworm using the mythtv-light method. The
> > only downside is that mythtv-light provides no mythconverg database,
> > mythtv user setup, or Storage Group directory setup. But that is a
> > script I've had for years.
>
> I've been using the dmo packages since ~2006 and haven't had reason to
> change is all.
>
> I don't run unstable really, I run a testing system with unstable as a
> second package source with lower priority, which gives a kind of
> rolling-distro experience on Debian, again just something I've been
> doing for years, I would especially recommend it unless you like that
^wouldn't
> sort of thing. Because of that I happen to also pull in the DMO
> unstable branch too.
>
> I'm pretty sure Christian has stable branches of this stuff too which
> gets the same stuff once it seems okay -- I'm sure v35 will end up
> there in due course.
>
> Ian.
>
>