Re: Suggestion: add -dmo suffix to package names

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:31:59PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> I was not aware of this convention. In fact, I've never noticed the subtle
> difference in the debian_revision number. :-/
>
> May be this would be the right place to clearly indicate the dmo origin with a
> debian_revision like -0.3.dmo or -0.4.dmo ?
>
> As a matter of fact, a similar scheme is used by jpackage.org [1]. All their
> package release version (the redhat equivalent of debian_revision) ends with
> .jpp5 (5 is for Rhel5). E.g. -2.jpp5

So does backports of course with bpo in the version.

--
Len Sorensen