Re: Packaging of the chrome flashplayer-pepper

On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:56:58AM +0000, Franz Schrober wrote:
> you still seem to have got it wrong.

Who got it wrong on "the only one which is able to provide a working and fast
updated package", on "broken" and on "It has no way to get security updates
automatically" ? As I already wrote, "It may not be how you expect it to be,
but security updates are supported", and quite fast.

> It is one style of packaging it

That's an entirely different discussion.

Regards,

Bart Martens